Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Multi protocol support (stage #1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trent Piepho wrote:
It's really the other way around, the padding inside xxx_info and inside
dvbs2_params (none of the other xxx_params have padding) is useless.  The
padding inside the union takes care of it.


That will alter the size of the individual delivery system structs, in binary compatibility mode.
The padding will be useless, they way you say.

Regarding your other comment i don't think LK folks would accept such a
convoluted way.

I wonder if they will have issues with having bitflags inside an enum.

Complain about the existing API. Never heard this argument before.





_______________________________________________

linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux