Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Multi protocol support (stage #1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trent Piepho wrote:

Basically that takes GET_CAPS with delivery == 0 and makes it a new ioctl.
GET_CAPS is now simpler, but you have another ioctl in the API.  For single
standard tuners, the get_caps ioctl's code stays the same, but a new get_info
or get_delsys ioctl needs to be added.  So the trade off is more work in the
drivers, for a simpler API.  Either way seems reasonable to me.


Originally due to your comments it had to go. Now how can you say either way is fine with you ?
I can find a reasonable answer


Manu


_______________________________________________

linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux