> Well, that's one way. We move CA related stuff from the user into the > kernel space. It doesn't matter for me (I'm trying to implement multiple > CAM support for libdvben50221 with Andrew at the moment), but wouldn't it > break other software (like vdr etc) which depend on this? > > So we have two options right now: > > - implementing a kernel layer with support for both, the old and the new > method Thats kinda why I was asking - to see what people thought. I've just had a look at the VDR source, and it won't cope with this change. So we can't do it really... maybe if we ever do another version of the DVB API. > - breaking API of libdvben50221, which hasn't been published offically > (only available through mercury) I don't mind breaking this API. its still under development. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
