On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Michael Krufky wrote: > The indirection is necessary, because VIDEO_CX88_VP3054 cannot both > depend on VIDEO_CX88_DVB_MT352 (which depends on > !VIDEO_CX88_DVB_ALL_FRONTENDS) and be selected by > VIDEO_CX88_DVB_ALL_FRONTENDS at the same time. I don't really know what > that condition is called... "circular dependency paradox" ? Thank you, it makes perfect sense now. In essence you have this: config A select B config B depends on !A If A is selected then B needs to be true because A selected it, but B can't be true because it depends on !A. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
