Alan Nisota wrote: > As far as the ongoing DVB-S2 conversation goes, I can easily adapt to > any solution which is implemented. I'm not sure I followed the entire > conversation about using FE_SET_FRONTEND_EX, and why it is preferable > to modifying dvb_frontend_parameters directly. I'm willing to sit on > the fence until a solution is decided on. take part in that discussion please. i made 2 suggestion for now, but the first neither the second were accepted, like they were worked out. although the discussion about renaming e.g. PSK_8 to MOD_8PSK, is not really a blocking fact, that should prevent us to have the so-called FE_SET_MODE ioctl. all this stuff can and maybe must done, but it is in general independant from mine. the next main problem on the discussion is, that we have only ONE enumeration value left for the fe_capabilities enums. so even, if we would add all the different modulations, we can definiately not return all these capabilities. this enumeration thing is at its end. my suggestion was to have the last value to signal that this fe driver can report capabilities with calling backported API V4 IOCTLs, that are seperated for different capabilities. i will do another suggestion around the weekend or monday, i am actually not exactly sure. best regards marcel _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
