(Hmm. Is the list software too clever? I've only received one copy which, lacking List-Id, got filed exactly where I didn't want it. M-F-T modified accordingly.) I demand that Johannes Stezenbach may or may not have written... > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:36:50AM +0100, Darren Salt wrote: >> The attached patch stops dvbscan's -c option from overriding an earlier >> -o. (Either this should be applied or the --help text should be updated to >> say that -c overrides -o.) [snip; tagline] >> It won't work. > "It won't work" is what I am thinking. -c implies that no NIT is parsed, > thus only OUTPUT_PIDS makes sense. Well... yes and no. Scanning just the current transponder has its uses and a manual merge - regardless of format - is possible; this is usually easier if the output is already in the right format. (It will be anyway if -o is specified *after* -c, but when I hit this problem, it was when I appended -c because I'd forgotten it and vdr was running.) However, I think that the NIT should be parsed anyway if possible. -- | Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | d youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Debian, | Northumberland | s zap,tartarus,org | RISC OS | Toon Army | @ | We've got Souness, we don't want him "Why stop now, just when I'm hating it?"
