hermann pitton wrote: >Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2005, 00:53 -0400 schrieb Michael Krufky: > > >>Luis Ochoa wrote: >> >> >>>OK, that didn't work either. Plain vanilla kernel (latest stable >>>2.6.13.4) configured with "just" what I need. CVS v4l + dvb. Same >>>error. Now analog tv doesn't work either... >>> >>> >>You have found quite a strange bug... It looks like the tda9887 module >>didn't load, and bttv got the tda9887 mixed up with the tua6034... I >>have no idea why or how this could have happened. I have a patch that >>might fix this for you, but I don't think it should go into cvs. Try >>this out and tell me what happens... (for curiosity's sake) >> >> > >Hi Mike, > >already reported that I managed once with a high debug load enabled to >get the tda9887 attached as tuner on 0x96 when testing the new tda8290 >code. > >It scans now over the full possible address range for the tda8290 >demodulator as a tuner and that is identical to the one of tda9887, >except 0x94 is not yet on tda9887. > >Cheers, >Hermann > Aha! That certainly explains it... Thank you, Hermann. I'll wait on Hartmut for a fix.... Until then, I'll refer my testers to my patch earlier in the thread. Hopefully that should temporarily solve it. -- Michael Krufky
