On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:55, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > Isn't this what the dvb-pll.c/h stuff was trying to achieve? Or does that > > have drawbacks? > > It has some drawbacks (limited to 4bytes and to special configurations of > pll-chip). But Andreas' approach is not just pll-programming, but also > e.g. demod-init-tab. Ah yeah you're right. Sounds cool to me then! It would certainly reduce a lot of the code duplication/complexity we have just now.
