Allan Stirling wrote: > Manu Abraham wrote: > >> Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> >>> >>> Is there anything wrong in this output? >>> >>> And another question is: why there is only one element in >>> parse_streams of type 2 (pid 320)? Where is the second one of type 4 >>> (pid 400)? In some previous posts I saw all the elements in ca_zap's >>> output. >>> >> >> Due to the bugs, the parser has to be reworked. >> > Glad (in a way) to hear this. Is there anything we can do to help? > (packet dumps, etc) > Testing would be required as soon as things are assumed to be fixed .. Manu
