Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > C.Y.M wrote: > >>Is the policy going to be that the cvs of the dvb-kernel should be in sync with >>current kernel release candidate (from kernel.org)? >> >>I am using 2.6.13-rc1 with cvs, and just wanted to make sure these changes work >>with 2.6.12? > > > As was discussed one or two months ago I'm going to maintain > a patch for users against the latest release: > http://linuxtv.org/downloads/patches/2.6.12/ > > For development CVS should work with latest -rc. > > I considered adding some temporary #if KERNEL_VERSION, > they are not difficult to remove when creating patches > for lkml. But they make it much harder to feed back > changes from the kernel into CVS, so I'd like to avoid it. > Sounds good. Thanks for clarifying that, again. :) Now I can understand how the #if's make it more difficult to keep in sync with upstream. Regards, C.