Kenneth Aafl?y wrote: > l?rdag 2. juli 2005, 01:41, skrev Kenneth Aafl?y: > > I was thinking while Johannes was doing the real work, merging patches. > > > > What if backward compatability was kept somewhere in CVS, eg /patches. > > > > We check in the Makefile of build-2.6 if the kernel version matches the > > current version of CVS, if not we try to apply some patch in /patches. > > > > The patch applied may change the semantics of Makefile so that it does > > noe apply the check for higher level kernel, or will bail out if a > > higher level kernel is discovered, eg the user upgrades kernel > > beneeth our feet. > > > > Any thought on this is appreciated, as it's only a rough idea. Sounds OK to me, but only if I don't have to maintain this ;-/ Johannes
