w-thiel@xxxxxxx <w-thiel@xxxxxxx> : [...] > Of course, I appreciate your patch: IIRC, 2.95 is still recommended > in the kernel sources. Last time I raised the subject on l-k, there was no strong technical reason to use a kernel built with 2.95.x. Each of the 2.95.[234] compiler has been caught miscompiling kernel code, especially in the networking part (Google is your friend). This is no excuse to introduce new gcc syntaxic style but I would take the compiler recommendation with a pinch of salt. -- Ueimor
