On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 w-thiel@xxxxxxx wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:48:09PM +0100, Olaf Titz wrote: >> PLEASE folks, make sure not to break gcc 2.95. Can't be that hard at >> all. Until 3.x produces a kernel which does not crash DVB (3.3.3 does >> not, will try 3.4.3 later) I'm recommending to stick with 2.95. >> > I have no problems with gcc 3.3.5 when compiling a kernel here. > Of course, I appreciate your patch: IIRC, 2.95 is still recommended > in the kernel sources. Is there an option for 3.x gcc to produce warnings for 2.95 incompatibilities? Most of the gcc-2.95 error are in my drivers. I simply don't notice them, because it is working and the compiler doessn't moan. regards, Patrick
