On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:51:46PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > I wonder whether there is a reason for letting dvb_register_adapter > allocate the struct dvb_adapter. I think it is better to embed struct > dvb_adapter in the hardware's private struct and pass that one to the > register function instead. That's how it's handled in the V4 API. > I think even the 'void *priv' field of struct dvb_adapter could then be > replaced by the container_of(x) macro. Probably... Johannes
