On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:20:17PM +0000, Kershner, David A wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:06 AM > > To: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; akpm@linux- > > foundation.org; jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; driverdev-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; *S-Par- > > Maintainer <SParMaintainer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] move visorbus out of staging to > > drivers/virt/visorbus > > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:54:30PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:49:09PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 04:07:29PM -0400, David Kershner wrote: > > > > > > This patchset moves drivers/staging/unisys/include to > > > > > > include/linux/visorbus, and moves drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus to > > > > > > drivers/virt/visorbus. > > > > > > > > > > Um, are you thinking it is ready to be moved? Have you asked for > > > > > another review? > > > > > > > Thank you for taking a quick look at our patch series. Part of the motivation > behind this submission was, in fact, to initiate another code review. What is > the formal procedure for initiating a code review? Send an email that says, "Hey Greg, we think the code is ready to be moved out of staging, can you review it to see if we have missed anything?" Of course, do it _AFTER_ you have fixed up the checkpatch.pl issues. That's not even done yet... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
