> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 5:20 PM > To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx> > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:03:44PM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 11:40 AM > > > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:58:52PM +0300, laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx > wrote: > > > > From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Your subject says 'v4' yet the other patches here in the series do > > > not, they say nothing, or 'v2', and the 0/10 patch says 'v6'! > > > > I'm tracking the patch versions individually and use the cover letter > > version (v6 currently) to reflect the version of the patch series as a > > whole. There are a bunch of patches that are either newly introduced in this > series or didn't had multiple versions so I didn't tagged them with a version tag. > > The patch [10/10] didn't changed since v4 so I left the version > > unchanged. The only change was in patch [07/10] for which I added a commit > message so I bumped the version to v2. > > And that's totally crazy. What do you expect me, or anyone else, to know what > to do with that. Heck, I can't even sort them by proper order in which to apply > them in, if I wanted to. You are keeping me from actually using your work :( > > > > Please fix up and do this correctly. The _whole_ patch series is > > > versioned, otherwise how can I sort them to apply them in the correct order? > > > > Want me to tag all the patches with the same version (that is, v7 for > > the next respin)? > > Yes, like everyone else does please :) > Ok, finally got it. :-) Will do so in the next spin. --- Thanks & Best Regards, Laurentiu _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
