On 28 April 2017 at 11:07, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 03:21:31PM +0100, Eric Curtin wrote: >> checkpatch spits out a warning about the 80 character line limit. Split >> the parameters of these functions onto different lines. Put the ; with >> the macro caller instead. Lined up parameters as there was another >> CHECK warning about that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > Patch does not apply to my tree at all :( Hi Greg, Sorry I didn't realize you replied. I gave up on these drivers because I read around and saw that these drivers are unlikely to ever be merged properly into the mainline kernel, while they use this deprecated framework: https://github.com/notro/fbtft/wiki/Development I know you were involved in some of these conversations: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/23/146 My main reason for helping with this, was so my rpi3 display would "just work" on future distro's I installed. I'd struggle to port to this new framework as I have no experience with drivers. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
