On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:19:59 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 01:57:14PM -0300, Tiago Koji Castro Shibata wrote:
> > Fix checkpatch.pl "WARNING: line over 80 characters"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tiago Koji Castro Shibata <tiago.shibata@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
> > index 77b242e09932..5abb5922ad7d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
> > @@ -912,7 +912,8 @@ static int _nbu2ss_epn_out_pio(
> > if (data > 0) {
> > /*---------------------------------------------------------*/
> > /* Copy of fraction byte */
> > - Temp32.dw = _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum - 1].EP_READ);
> > + Temp32.dw =
> > + _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum - 1].EP_READ);
>
> That's horrid code now, and does not follow the coding style rules.
> Sorry, you can't "fix" one thing and make the code worse :)
>
> Remember, checkpatch.pl is a "guide", sometimes it doesn't make sense to
> change anything, like here.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I was unsure about shifting the continuation line to the right... Does this look
better?
Temp32.dw = _nbu2ss_readl(
&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum - 1].EP_READ);
I am aware of the coding style but ended up leaving both lines at the same level
since that's how it's already used in other lines of this file (e.g. line 904).
I'll do another patch and shift other occurences of continuation lines to the
right.
Thanks,
Tiago
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
