On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 07:45:12PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > Function tx_device_task() is a candidate for refactoring. Checkpatch > emits a number of warnings/checks for this function. > > Patch 01 inverts if statement conditional and reduces the level of > nesting. > > Patch 02 renames rc -> ret, fixes function call and checkpatch WARNING. > > Patch 03 fixes function argument alignment, and checkpatch CHECK. > > Code is untested. Patch set applies and builds on x86_64 and PowerPC. I count 35+ patches from you for the same driver within 2 days. What order am I supposed to apply these patches in? Please resend them all as a single patch series, so I have a chance to get it right. And you can wait until I apply a series before sending another one, otherwise we can easily get out of sync :( thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel