On 01/13/2017 04:03 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Am Freitag, den 06.01.2017, 18:11 -0800 schrieb Steve Longerbeam:
Enables the OV5642 parallel-bus sensor, and the OV5640 MIPI CSI-2 sensor.
Both hang off the same i2c2 bus, so they require different (and non-
default) i2c slave addresses.
The OV5642 connects to the parallel-bus mux input port on ipu1_csi0_mux.
The OV5640 connects to the input port on the MIPI CSI-2 receiver on
mipi_csi. It is set to transmit over MIPI virtual channel 1.
Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts | 5 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts | 6 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts
index 0f06ca5..fec2524 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts
@@ -48,3 +48,8 @@
model = "Freescale i.MX6 DualLite SABRE Lite Board";
compatible = "fsl,imx6dl-sabrelite", "fsl,imx6dl";
};
+
+&ipu1_csi1_from_ipu1_csi1_mux {
+ data-lanes = <0 1>;
+ clock-lanes = <2>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts
index 66d10d8..9e2d26d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts
@@ -52,3 +52,9 @@
&sata {
status = "okay";
};
+
+&ipu1_csi1_from_mipi_vc1 {
+ data-lanes = <0 1>;
+ clock-lanes = <2>;
+};
+
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi
index 795b5a5..bca9fed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
* OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*/
+
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/imx6qdl-clock.h>
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
@@ -96,6 +98,15 @@
};
};
+ mipi_xclk: mipi_xclk {
+ compatible = "pwm-clock";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <22000000>;
+ clock-output-names = "mipi_pwm3";
+ pwms = <&pwm3 0 45>; /* 1 / 45 ns = 22 MHz */
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+
gpio-keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys";
pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -220,6 +231,22 @@
};
};
+&ipu1_csi0_from_ipu1_csi0_mux {
+ bus-width = <8>;
+ data-shift = <12>; /* Lines 19:12 used */
+ hsync-active = <1>;
+ vync-active = <1>;
+};
+
+&ipu1_csi0_mux_from_parallel_sensor {
+ remote-endpoint = <&ov5642_to_ipu1_csi0_mux>;
+};
+
+&ipu1_csi0 {
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ipu1_csi0>;
+};
+
&audmux {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_audmux>;
@@ -299,6 +326,52 @@
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c2>;
status = "okay";
+
+ ov5640: camera@40 {
+ compatible = "ovti,ov5640";
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ov5640>;
+ clocks = <&mipi_xclk>;
+ clock-names = "xclk";
+ reg = <0x40>;
+ xclk = <22000000>;
This is superfluous, you can use clk_get_rate on mipi_xclk.
This property is actually there to tell the driver what to set the
rate to, with clk_set_rate(). So you are saying it would be better
to set the rate in the device tree and the driver should only
retrieve the rate?
Steve
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
