On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:27:05PM -0400, James Simmons wrote: > Being over zealous in removing unused EXPORT_SYMBOLs two functions > lustre_swab_[lmv|lov]_mds_md exports were removed. They need to be > exported so this patch restores those EXPORT_SYMBOLS. Same mistake > was done when porting to the upstream client. > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/14545 > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/15159 > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6486 > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c > index 1349bf6..8717685 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c > @@ -1861,6 +1861,7 @@ void lustre_swab_lmv_mds_md(union lmv_mds_md *lmm) > break; > } > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lustre_swab_lmv_mds_md); I don't see anyone else using this symbol, in fact, it could now be marked static. So why export it? > void lustre_swab_lmv_user_md(struct lmv_user_md *lum) > { > @@ -1914,6 +1915,7 @@ void lustre_swab_lov_mds_md(struct lov_mds_md *lmm) > __swab16s(&lmm->lmm_stripe_count); > __swab16s(&lmm->lmm_layout_gen); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lustre_swab_lov_mds_md); This is used by other files (it's listed twice in lustre_idl.h...), so it might need to be exported, but why am I not seeing a build error without this change? confused, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
