Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luis,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
<luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23/06/16 02:29, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
>> <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The common format to check if a function returned an error pointer is to
>>> use PTR_ERR(). Instead of ERR_PTR() which is used to return said errors.
>>>
>>> Also, if there was an error returning -EINVAL instead of -1 is more
>>> appropriate.
>>
>> These two changes could be argued to be separate changes deserving of
>> their own patches.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> However if everyone else is ok with that, this is:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> If you don't mind I will resend as two separate patches and include your
> Reviewed-by in both.

Providing there are no changes other than rebasing and splitting, I'm
fine with that.,

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux