From: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvidson@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch changes the vague -1 return values to -EPERM.
This operation is not supported is a good alternative
to -1 because the return is basically telling the caller
that the processor doesn't support vmcall operations.
Signed-off-by: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvidson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kershner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <Timothy.Sell@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/iovmcall_gnuc.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/iovmcall_gnuc.h b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/iovmcall_gnuc.h
index b08b6ec..98ea7f3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/iovmcall_gnuc.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/iovmcall_gnuc.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ __unisys_vmcall_gnuc(unsigned long tuple, unsigned long reg_ebx,
cpuid(0x00000001, &cpuid_eax, &cpuid_ebx, &cpuid_ecx, &cpuid_edx);
if (!(cpuid_ecx & 0x80000000))
- return -1;
+ return -EPERM;
__asm__ __volatile__(".byte 0x00f, 0x001, 0x0c1" : "=a"(result) :
"a"(tuple), "b"(reg_ebx), "c"(reg_ecx));
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ __unisys_extended_vmcall_gnuc(unsigned long long tuple,
cpuid(0x00000001, &cpuid_eax, &cpuid_ebx, &cpuid_ecx, &cpuid_edx);
if (!(cpuid_ecx & 0x80000000))
- return -1;
+ return -EPERM;
__asm__ __volatile__(".byte 0x00f, 0x001, 0x0c1" : "=a"(result) :
"a"(tuple), "b"(reg_ebx), "c"(reg_ecx), "d"(reg_edx));
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
