On 02/08/2016 07:48 AM, Bhumika Goyal wrote: > This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro. > This was done with coccinelle: > @@ int g; @@ > -(1 << g) > +BIT(g) > > Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@xxxxxxxxx> Hi, Thanks for the patch. > --- > drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c > index 2226051..f631012 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c > @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static ssize_t ad7816_show_value(struct device *dev, > value = (s8)((data >> AD7816_TEMP_FLOAT_OFFSET) - 103); > data &= AD7816_TEMP_FLOAT_MASK; > if (value < 0) > - data = (1 << AD7816_TEMP_FLOAT_OFFSET) - data; > + data = BIT(AD7816_TEMP_FLOAT_OFFSET) - data; But in this case this is a false positive. The intended semantic meaning here is 2**... not BIT(...). Using BIT() here in my opinion only causes confusion. > return sprintf(buf, "%d.%.2d\n", value, data * 25); > } > return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", data); > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
