OK. Since the maintainers are CC'd, I guess I should wait for a
clarification about this?
El 02/12/15 a las 10:29, Dan Carpenter escribió:
Put v2 in the subject. Also the subsystem prefix is:
[PATCH v3] staging: wilc1000: ...
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:09:04PM -0300, Mario J. Rugiero wrote:
This patch replaces an "if (ptr > 0)" comparison that seems to be a
confusing way to check for null by a simpler "if (ptr)" check.
Signed-off-by: Mario J. Rugiero <mrugiero@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Remove the != NULL because checkpatch complains.
drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
index d5b7725..0c87f6c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
@@ -2270,7 +2270,7 @@ static void Handle_AddBeacon(struct host_if_drv *hif_drv,
*pu8CurrByte++ = ((pstrSetBeaconParam->tail_len >> 16) & 0xFF);
*pu8CurrByte++ = ((pstrSetBeaconParam->tail_len >> 24) & 0xFF);
- if (pstrSetBeaconParam->tail > 0)
+ if (pstrSetBeaconParam->tail)
Probably the intention was to check if "pstrSetBeaconParam->tail_len > 0"
but I'm not sure. The wilc1000 maintainers are very responsive though
so maybe they will know for sure.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
