On Friday 25 September 2015 01:52:37 Drokin, Oleg wrote: > On Sep 24, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 24 September 2015 04:02:09 Drokin, Oleg wrote: > These are all the users. > Seems to be pretty much u32 (or unsigned int when printing) everywhere. Ok, I'll the patch then to clarify this and leave the format unchanged. > > Another option would be to change the code storing the times there > > to do: > > > > header->ph_sec = (u32)ts.tv_sec; > > header->ph_usec = (ts.tv_sec & 0xffffffff00000000ull) | > > (ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC); > > > > and do the reverse on the user space side. This would be both endian- > > safe and backwards compatible, although rather ugly. > > Indeed, thats' quite ugly. > I think in the next 90 years we will need some other adjustments to the > log format and should be able to include this one with them > (e.g. there are only 16 bits for the cpu, considering we have 260+ core > CPUs on the market today, might as well overflow that quite soon). Ok. Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
