On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:51:33PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 05:50:27PM +0200, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 07:42:24PM +0530, Sunil Shahu wrote:
> > > Variable "u32 c" always re-initialize in for loop.
> > > Initialized value of "u32 c" is not used in function
> > > and is redundant, hence removed.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sunil Shahu <shshahu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> > > index 21465c9..8627928 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> > > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static u8 crc32_reverseBit(u8 data)
> > > static void crc32_init(void)
> > > {
> > > sint i, j;
> > > - u32 c = 0x12340000;
> > > + u32 c;
> > > u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1;
> > > u8 k;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.9.1
> >
> > The patch is good, the value assigned to c is immediately overwritten.
> >
> > Unfortunately the patch fails to apply in staging-testing and linux-next. Could
> > you please rebase?
>
> It's based on earlier patches on the list.
>
> Normally only Greg tests that patches apply and it will for him because
> he applies them as the order they arrive. But we should probably start
> putting notes on the patches which earlier patches are required...
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
I see. Thanks for the explanation.
Then the patch is good, but it doesn't need a Reviewed-by line since it you
pre-approved it.
Regards,
Luis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
