On 06/02, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:29:17AM +0200, Konrad Zapalowicz wrote:
> > On 06/02, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > size_t should print using %zu, but here it was using %d and hence we
> > > were getting warning while printing.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I think it will be easy to remove the other warnings if all the typedefs
> > > are removed first.
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 6 +++---
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> > > index d0e7610..6d854fd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> > > @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int spi_cmd_complete(uint8_t cmd, uint32_t adr, uint8_t *b, uint32_t sz,
> > > #undef NUM_DUMMY_BYTES
> > >
> > > if (len2 > (sizeof(wb) / sizeof(wb[0]))) {
> > > - PRINT_ER("[wilc spi]: spi buffer size too small (%d) (%d)\n",
> > > + PRINT_ER("[wilc spi]: spi buffer size too small (%d) (%lu)\n",
> >
> > Hi, it seems that the above line should use %zu too. Am I correct or I'm
> > missing something?
> oops. my mistake. %lu is correct but i missed mentioning the warning
> about long unsigned int in the commit message.
Why %lu here and %zu in other places? I mean that it is the same size_t
or I'm missing something?
- konrad
> regards
> sudip
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
