Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix warning while printing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:29:17AM +0200, Konrad Zapalowicz wrote:
> On 06/02, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > size_t should print using %zu, but here it was using %d and hence we
> > were getting warning while printing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > I think it will be easy to remove the other warnings if all the typedefs
> > are removed first.
> > 
> >  drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c               | 2 +-
> >  drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> > index d0e7610..6d854fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> > @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int spi_cmd_complete(uint8_t cmd, uint32_t adr, uint8_t *b, uint32_t sz,
> >  #undef NUM_DUMMY_BYTES
> >  
> >  	if (len2 > (sizeof(wb) / sizeof(wb[0]))) {
> > -		PRINT_ER("[wilc spi]: spi buffer size too small (%d) (%d)\n",
> > +		PRINT_ER("[wilc spi]: spi buffer size too small (%d) (%lu)\n",
> 
> Hi, it seems that the above line should use %zu too. Am I correct or I'm
> missing something?
oops. my mistake. %lu is correct but i missed mentioning the warning
about long unsigned int in the commit message.

regards
sudip
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux