On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:01:53AM -0500, Jaime Arrocha wrote: > > > On 05/07/2015 12:34 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:13:41PM -0500, Jaime Arrocha wrote: > >>Errors found by checkpatch.pl. > >>ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible > >>/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/das16m1.c:49 > >>/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/das16m1.c:50 > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Jaime Arrocha <jarr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >you are sending this patch second time with different subject. > >any reason for that? > > > >regards > >sudip > > > > Yes, the first one had the subject line too long and not clear. > When I need to resend a patch like I did, should I add on the second > one the reason behind resending and dismissing the first one? Thank > you. first of all you should reply to the first patch stating that should not be applied and that you have sent a second patch. And this one should have had a v2 in the subject with the reason of v2 below the --- cutoff. since you have already sent the second patch just reply to the fist patch as of now. And you have sent the patches to greg@xxxxxxxxx, it should have been gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . always use get_maintainer.pl to see whom to send patches. regards sudip _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
