On March 23, 2015 9:06:26 AM EDT, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 08:53:19AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote: >> >> >> On March 23, 2015 6:40:06 AM EDT, Dan Carpenter ><dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 08:04:35PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote: >> >> Fixes the checkpath.pl error where the opening bracket has a >unneeded >> >space between >> >> it and the function name for a if statement in the >> >marco,VMX_WAIT_FOR_FIELD32. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c | 2 +- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c >> >b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c >> >> index 1daeb31..0408a12 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c >> >> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ struct octeon_hcd { >> >> type c; \ >> >> while (1) { \ >> >> c.u32 = __cvmx_usb_read_csr32(usb, address); \ >> >> - if (c.s.field op (value)) { \ >> >> + if (c.s.field op(value)) { \ >> > >> >"op" is not a function here. This is macro and top is an operation >> >like >> >"+" or "*". So checkpatch.pl is wrong. >> > >> >regards, >> >dan carpenter >> Very well then, I wasn't sure if we did the same spacing style for >marcos. > >We do but this is a very unusual case. > >regards, >dan carpenter Dan, Sorry about that my mistake. In addition, have you looked at my second patch to see if that one is correct. Thanks, Nick -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel