Hi Greg,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:34:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Gcc < 4.3 doesn't understand binary constants (0b*):
>>
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-sysfs.c:156:19: error: invalid suffix "b111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:3: error: invalid suffix "b1111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:11: error: invalid suffix "b1111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:19: error: invalid suffix "b11111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:28: error: invalid suffix "b1111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:36: error: invalid suffix "b1111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:44: error: invalid suffix "b1111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:159:52: error: invalid suffix "b11111" on integer constant
>> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_hx8340bn.c:160:3: error: invalid suffix "b111" on integer constant
>> ...
>>
>> Hence use hexadecimal constants (0x*) instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> This is against v4.0-rc3. In next-20150310 there are two whitespace
>> differences.
>
> Can you make it against -next? I can't get this to apply as-is, sorry.
Sure, will do. I was wondering if you wanted to sent this fix to Linus for v4.0,
as the build is broken for gcc < 4.3, and keep the changes in -next for v4.1.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
