On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 16:31 -0800, Tolga Ceylan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Might as well remove the unnecessary cast too: > >> memcpy(skb->cb, &dev, sizeof(dev)); > >> but it might be better to avoid the memcpy and use an assign > >> *(struct net_device *)skb->cb = dev; [] > Should I sent a new set of patches (including memcpy change)? > Or reply to the series with a single memcpy change patch? Let Larry Finger decide if he wants the patches at all first. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
