On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Might as well remove the unnecessary cast too: >> >> memcpy(skb->cb, &dev, sizeof(dev)); >> >> but it might be better to avoid the memcpy and use an assign >> >> *(struct net_device *)skb->cb = dev; >> > Should I sent a new set of patches (including memcpy change)? Or reply to the series with a single memcpy change patch? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
