On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:27:11PM +0100, Bas Peters wrote: > >> @@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ void rtl88eu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower(struct adapter *adapt, u8 *powerlevel) > >> ptr++; > >> } > >> } > >> - rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, > >> - &pwrtrac_value); > >> + rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, &pwrtrac_value); > > you are introducing one warning to fix one error. line over 80 character. > > Isn't that warning more of a guideline, rather than an actual warning? You can't fight checkpatch.pl. We reject the worst or the worst "break lines up into smaller chunks" patches where they obviously hurt readability, but we almost always silence the warning in the end. The original code in this case was fine. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
