On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:41:04AM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 01/31/2015 10:19 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:45:33PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> >> while (phead != plist) {
> >>- psta = container_of(plist, struct sta_info , list);
> >>+ container_of(plist, struct sta_info, list);
> >
> >
> >Argh!!! No.
> >
> >For this one, I didn't need an context to see that it was wrong, so I
> >accidentally reviewed it instead of just marking it as read.
> >
>
> Dan,
>
> This guy does not have a brain - he only knows how to run cppcheck. You
> cannot expect him to think about what he does. In addition, he does not have
> any of the hardware that uses the drivers he is mangling. He can only test
> that it builds correctly. Do not bother to ever review anything he sends.
>
> Earlier this month, he submitted a set of patches that impacted routines
> that I was working on. I asked him to hold those until I was finished to
> avoid conflicts. Guess what? The same set was resubmitted 4 days later!!
>
> He was told that sets of patches were supposed to be submitted with a [PATCH
> X/Y] structure, but he has ignored that suggestion, thus there is no way to
> send an overall NACK.
>
> @Greg: Please put this guy on your permanent blacklist. It takes too much
> time to read and respond to his multiple posts. Kalle has already done that
> for wireless.
I've now dropped all patches he recently sent me.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
