On 01/31/2015 10:19 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:45:33PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
while (phead != plist) {
- psta = container_of(plist, struct sta_info , list);
+ container_of(plist, struct sta_info, list);
Argh!!! No.
For this one, I didn't need an context to see that it was wrong, so I
accidentally reviewed it instead of just marking it as read.
Dan,
This guy does not have a brain - he only knows how to run cppcheck. You cannot
expect him to think about what he does. In addition, he does not have any of the
hardware that uses the drivers he is mangling. He can only test that it builds
correctly. Do not bother to ever review anything he sends.
Earlier this month, he submitted a set of patches that impacted routines that I
was working on. I asked him to hold those until I was finished to avoid
conflicts. Guess what? The same set was resubmitted 4 days later!!
He was told that sets of patches were supposed to be submitted with a [PATCH
X/Y] structure, but he has ignored that suggestion, thus there is no way to send
an overall NACK.
@Greg: Please put this guy on your permanent blacklist. It takes too much time
to read and respond to his multiple posts. Kalle has already done that for wireless.
Larry
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
