On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:25:53PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:18:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Richard, asked some questions out of band. > > > > I like these patches where they can remove the whole line. I don't like > > them where they leave stray, unneeded function calls. Or if we know > > that we need the function calls then I like those. > > > > Also when it comes to the point where we move this code out of staging > > then we can look at these warnings again. Normally people are good at > > fixing up any remaining static checker warnings at the end. (Except for > > binder, obviously. Binder didn't clean up anything. It's maintained by > > a mailing list which has yet to add itself to MAINTAINERS. Stupid > > binder mailing list). > > What remaining issues were in the binder code? And I have a > non-mailing-list MAINTAINERS entry for binder in linux-next, it will go > to Linus in a few hours. > Oh. Hm... I looked at it again and it's not as bad as I remember. I appologize. I did have a question but I'll take it to another thread. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
