On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:18:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Richard, asked some questions out of band. > > I like these patches where they can remove the whole line. I don't like > them where they leave stray, unneeded function calls. Or if we know > that we need the function calls then I like those. > > Also when it comes to the point where we move this code out of staging > then we can look at these warnings again. Normally people are good at > fixing up any remaining static checker warnings at the end. (Except for > binder, obviously. Binder didn't clean up anything. It's maintained by > a mailing list which has yet to add itself to MAINTAINERS. Stupid > binder mailing list). What remaining issues were in the binder code? And I have a non-mailing-list MAINTAINERS entry for binder in linux-next, it will go to Linus in a few hours. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
