At Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:52:27 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:35:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:04:55 -0600, > > Chris Rorvick wrote: > > > > > > > At Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:35:46 -0600, > > > > Chris Rorvick wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I have a TonePort UX2 that I've used for testing, meaning that some of > > > >> this is really only compile-tested. > > > > > > > > If anyone is responsible for testing with real hardware, I'll happily > > > > review. > > > > > > To be clear, the TonePort UX2 is real hardware. But this driver > > > basically supports four classes of Line 6 devices and I'm only covering > > > one of them. > > > > > > So this series is a first step in trying to address this. Having this > > > as a single driver probably made sense when it was a separate project, > > > but now that it is in-tree it seems like the POD, PODHD, TonePort, and > > > Variax pieces should each be separate drivers that each depend on a core > > > Line 6 driver. I think the cleanup in this series will make that > > > easier. None of this is my area of expertise, though, so advice and > > > feedback is very welcome. > > > > > > > are there any active developers for this driver? > > > > > > I intended to do further work. I know there is quite a bit of mundane > > > checkpatch cleanup that would need to get done before this could get > > > promoted, and I believe I read that it's using sysfs for stuff that > > > would normally be done via an ALSA interface, and the sysfs interface > > > has not been documented nor has it been justified. All stuff I thought > > > I might look into. > > > > > > But I'm just doing this for fun so I can't promise anything. :-) > > > > OK, so the situation looks fairly good, we have a few active > > developers and/or testers. And the current code doesn't look so > > terrible despite of it being in staging directory. That said, I think > > we can promote this stuff into sound/usb/line6 directory, then apply > > Chris' cleanup patches, and work on it further. > > > > Does it sound OK for you guys? Greg? > > > > Once when I get approval, I'll start a new clean branch on sound.git > > tree so that you guys can work on it further for 3.20 kernel. > > That sounds fine with me. I have 4 other patches in my "to-apply" queue > other than these 25 for this driver that I'll forward on to you for > inclusion in your tree. OK, feel free to mail me. Thanks! Takashi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
