> At Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:35:46 -0600, > Chris Rorvick wrote: >> >> I have a TonePort UX2 that I've used for testing, meaning that some of >> this is really only compile-tested. > > If anyone is responsible for testing with real hardware, I'll happily > review. To be clear, the TonePort UX2 is real hardware. But this driver basically supports four classes of Line 6 devices and I'm only covering one of them. So this series is a first step in trying to address this. Having this as a single driver probably made sense when it was a separate project, but now that it is in-tree it seems like the POD, PODHD, TonePort, and Variax pieces should each be separate drivers that each depend on a core Line 6 driver. I think the cleanup in this series will make that easier. None of this is my area of expertise, though, so advice and feedback is very welcome. > are there any active developers for this driver? I intended to do further work. I know there is quite a bit of mundane checkpatch cleanup that would need to get done before this could get promoted, and I believe I read that it's using sysfs for stuff that would normally be done via an ALSA interface, and the sysfs interface has not been documented nor has it been justified. All stuff I thought I might look into. But I'm just doing this for fun so I can't promise anything. :-) Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel