Hi Pavel, > On Jan 2, 2015, at 07:12 , Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/firmware >> +Date: October 2014 >> +KernelVersion: 3.18 >> +Contact: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> +Description: Name of the FPGA image file to load using firmware class. > > This is wrong interface, right? The only use of this string is to pass > it to udev. We should simply pass "fpga-0" as a firware name, and let > udev figure it out, no need to to prepare name in separate component, > then pass it to kernel, which passes it back to udev. > No. No dependencies on udev please. This should hook directly to the firmware loader interface which does not rely on userspace at all. >> +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/reset >> +Date: October 2014 >> +KernelVersion: 3.18 >> +Contact: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> +Description: Write 1 to reset the FPGA > > Does 0 need to be written there to pull the fpga out of reset? Is this > a suitable interface? > > Pavel > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html Regards — Pantelis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel