> +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/firmware > +Date: October 2014 > +KernelVersion: 3.18 > +Contact: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +Description: Name of the FPGA image file to load using firmware class. This is wrong interface, right? The only use of this string is to pass it to udev. We should simply pass "fpga-0" as a firware name, and let udev figure it out, no need to to prepare name in separate component, then pass it to kernel, which passes it back to udev. > +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/reset > +Date: October 2014 > +KernelVersion: 3.18 > +Contact: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +Description: Write 1 to reset the FPGA Does 0 need to be written there to pull the fpga out of reset? Is this a suitable interface? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
