On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 16:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:52:18PM +0000, Insop Song wrote: > > On Wed, April 02, 2014 1:04 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:24:03AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Staging driver pull request for 3.15-rc1 > > > > > > > > > > Here's the huge drivers/staging/ update for 3.15-rc1. > > > > > > > > > > Loads of cleanup fixes, a few drivers removed, and some new ones > > > added. > > > > > > > > > > All have been in linux-next for a while. > > > > > > > > > >[...] > > > > > > > > > > Insop Song (1): > > > > > staging: fpgaboot: Xilinx FPGA firmware download driver > > > > > > > > This commit adds checks for CONFIG_B4860G100. Is a patch to add a > > > > Kconfig symbol B4860G100 perhaps queued somewhere? > > > > > > Insop, I thought this config option was coming from some other place, right? > > > > > > > Paul, > > I didn't include CONFIG_B4860G100 in Kconfig in original patch set, > > since programming FPGA method can vary in different system, and this > > was discussed during the review with Greg as well. > > > > However, actual fpga programming method is well contained in io.c with > > ifdef-ed CONFIG_B4860G100, now I think I might better to update > > Kconfig to include CONFIG_B4860G100. > > > > Greg, what do you think? Any harm to add custom board CONFIG* to > > staging Kconfig? Let me know. > > Let's see what it would look like and we can go from there. Nothing appears to have changed: there are still checks for CONFIG_B4860G100 in next-20140904. Should I submit the trivial patch to remove those checks and the code they hide? Paul Bolle _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
