On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:36:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: >> > > This patch cleanup coding style issues reported by checkpatch. >> > > >> > > Tested by compilation only. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > --- >> > > Cahnges from V1: >> > > - Sent all patches in a series >> > >> > Why did you forget the other thing that I asked you to change? >> > >> > I can't take these as-is, sorry, please go back and re-read what I >> > wrote... >> >> Actually I was trying to do what you asked me on this E-mail: >> >> -- // -- >> You just sent me 4 patches, all with the same subject (but at least 2 of >> them had the order in which to apply them in, which is nice.) >> >> Please redo these such that they have a unique subject, and I can tell >> which order to apply them in, as I really have no idea about the second >> two. >> -- // -- >> >> I'm sending V3 as a single patch. > > That's going to get rejected as well :( > > You did put them in a nice order, but you had the same subject text for > each patch, which I told you not to do, right? > > {sigh} The noise was caused by my poor English language skills. When you wrote: "Please redo these such that they have a unique subject, and I can tell which order to apply them in, as I really have no idea about the second two." I understood: 1 - redo these patches 2 - such as they have a unique subject 3 - in a way Greg can tell in which order to apply them I just understood what you wanted today. Sorry for that. But, there is a plain text attachment on my previous E-mail with the V3 of the patch set. The V3 is a single patch instead of 4 patches, is that ok? Should I resend in a new thread? > > greg k-h -- Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel