On 06/16/2014 04:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
@@ -36,7 +37,10 @@ struct realtek_pci_sdmmc {
> struct rtsx_pcr *pcr;
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
> struct mmc_request *mrq;
>+ struct workqueue_struct *workq;
>+#define SDMMC_WORKQ_NAME "rtsx_pci_sdmmc_workq"
>
>+ struct work_struct work;
I am trying to understand why you need a work/workqueue to implement
this feature. Is that really the case?
Could you elaborate on the reasons?
Hi Uffe,
we need return as fast as possible in mmc_host_ops request(ops->request)
callback,
so the mmc core can continue handle next request.
when next request everything is ready, it will wait previous done(if not
done),
then call ops->request().
we can't use atomic context, because we use mutex_lock() to protect
resource, and we have to hold the lock during handle request.
So I use workq, we just queue a work and return in ops->request(),
The mmc core can continue without blocking at ops->request().
Best Regards.
micky.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
