On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:50:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:23:09PM +0200, mathias.engan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Mathias Engan <mathias.engan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > static int eucr_suspend(struct usb_interface *iface, pm_message_t message)
> > {
> > struct us_data *us = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
> > +
> > pr_info("--- eucr_suspend ---\n");
> > +
>
> Did checkpatch complain about this line not being here? Because that's
> not what you said above in the patch description :(
>
Ah. No. It did not. However, in the previous, and most of the following
functions there is a blank line after pr_info() so I added it so that
eucr_suspend() would conform to the style of the other, similar, functions.
Would you like me to resubmit or change the patch description?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
