On 3 June 2014 03:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: >> Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 14:13 -0700 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: >> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: >> > > The i.MX Image Processing Unit (IPU) contains a number of image processing >> > > blocks that sit right in the middle between DRM and V4L2. Some of the modules, >> > > such as Display Controller, Processor, and Interface (DC, DP, DI) or CMOS >> > > Sensor Interface (CSI) and their FIFOs could be assigned to either framework, >> > > but others, such as the dma controller (IDMAC) and image converter (IC) can >> > > be used by both. >> > > The IPUv3 core driver provides an internal API to access the modules, to be >> > > used by both DRM and V4L2 IPUv3 drivers. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > --- >> > > Changes since RFC: >> > > - Rebased onto current staging-next >> > > - Removed an unrelated change to ipu_pixelformat_to_colorspace >> > > - Avoided moving around the IPU_PIX_FMT_GBR24 #define >> > >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thank you. My favourite next step would be to send a pull request and >> have this merged into drm-next. Dave, Greg would you be ok with this? > > No objection from me, it's up to Dave what he wants for this. Yes please send me a pull req for this. Dave. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
