On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 14:13 -0700 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > The i.MX Image Processing Unit (IPU) contains a number of image processing > > > blocks that sit right in the middle between DRM and V4L2. Some of the modules, > > > such as Display Controller, Processor, and Interface (DC, DP, DI) or CMOS > > > Sensor Interface (CSI) and their FIFOs could be assigned to either framework, > > > but others, such as the dma controller (IDMAC) and image converter (IC) can > > > be used by both. > > > The IPUv3 core driver provides an internal API to access the modules, to be > > > used by both DRM and V4L2 IPUv3 drivers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes since RFC: > > > - Rebased onto current staging-next > > > - Removed an unrelated change to ipu_pixelformat_to_colorspace > > > - Avoided moving around the IPU_PIX_FMT_GBR24 #define > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you. My favourite next step would be to send a pull request and > have this merged into drm-next. Dave, Greg would you be ok with this? No objection from me, it's up to Dave what he wants for this. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
