On Mon, 19 May 2014 22:21:12 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote: > So, Jake, you're right, but if he redoes patch 2/6 then he has to redo > the rest as well. The bad names were bad in the original code already, > so normally we let people fix things up in follow on patches in that > case. > > Is that ok with you? Sure, that seems fine ... I only had fairly minor quibbles, the vast majority of it is good stuff ... Not sure it's useful (or even the right way to go about it), but, if it is, Greg (or Jason or whoever) can add my: Reviewed-by: Jake Edge <jake@xxxxxxx> to the patch set ... jake -- Jake Edge - LWN - jake@xxxxxxx - http://lwn.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
